Expanding Access to Quality Pre-K is Sound Public Policy

In 2013, preschool education received more attention in the media and public policy circles than it has for some time, in part because of a series of high profile proposals to expand access to quality pre-K. The scientific basis for these pre-K proposals is impressive. This new working paper brings to bear the full weight of the evidence to address the following questions:

A statistical summary of studies since 1960 demonstrates that effects persist and provides evidence about what works (intentional teaching with small groups).

What are the estimated effects of state and local pre-K programs in more recent years?

We provide estimated effect sizes for school readiness at K and for later achievement from studies conducted over the past two decades. Effects vary across programs, but are overwhelmingly positive. Long-term achievement gains tend to be smaller, but still can be substantial.

Is Head Start ineffective?

A national randomized trial of children who attended Head Start in 2002 found modest initial effects and failed to detect lasting impacts. That study underestimates effects by design, its greatest limitation; nevertheless, the results were disappointing. Since then Head Start has been subject to reforms including a Bush Administration emphasis on improving literacy and an increase in the percentage of teachers with college degrees. Data collected in 2003, 2006, and 2009 reveal large increases in the size of Head Start children’s language and literacy gains between 2003 and 2009.

Can government improve the quality of public preschool education?

Head Start provides one example, as described above. New Jersey provides another. It raised standards and implemented a continuous improvement system that transformed early care and education for all 3- and 4-year-olds in 31 cities from poor/mediocre to good/excellent over eight years. The latest follow up on the New Jersey children finds large gains in achievement and school success through grade 5 associated with pre-K attendance.

If states expand pre-K with temporary federal matching funds, what happens to state education budgets when that federal money is no longer available?

Looking ahead to 2030 using Census projections for numbers of children, NIEER projects that all but 1 state would spend less on education from pre-K through grade 12 under federal proposals that incentivize states to raise pre-K quality standards, offer a full school day, and serve all children under 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Idaho is the only state that might have to pay a little more, because it has relatively low costs for school failure today.

Budgetary Impact of Providing Quality Pre-K to All Children Under 200% FPL by State, By 2030

Given the answers to these questions it seems self-evident that local, state, and federal governments should expand access to quality pre-K and other enhancements of early education, especially for children in low-income families. In our new working paper, we explore what the research says about the impacts and importance of high-quality pre-K and provide estimates of how much each state could save on education pre-K to grade 12 under provisions of the proposed federal pre-K plans. Read the full details in our new paper.

– W. Steven Barnett, NIEER Director

7 Responses to Expanding Access to Quality Pre-K is Sound Public Policy

  1. Denise says:

    Finally a good plan for improving the quality of early education. Hope the government will be consistent about this and work this out as planned in the next coming years.

  2. […] of Head Start on skills that are not well-measured by standardized tests. In addition, a recent article by Steve Barnett of the National Institute for Early Education Research argues that recent efforts […]

  3. […] and federal proposals to expand access to quality pre-K is timely. A brief summary is available here. The paper addresses questions about the overall effectiveness of public universal preschool, the […]

  4. […] In view of the rising interest in expanding pre-K and debates over how to pay for it, NIEER’s new working paper on evidence regarding municipal, state, and federal proposals to expand access to quality pre-K is timely. A brief summary is available here. […]

  5. […] This paper by NIEER addresses what evidence says about effective preschool education and long-term cognitive benefits, estimated effects of state and local pre-K programs in more recent years, evidence regarding Head Start’s effectiveness, whether government can improve the quality of public preschool education, and what would happen to state education budgets once federal money was not available. […]

  6. […] natural experiments that suggest that Head Start has long-term effects. Recent Head Start reforms may have improved its quality relative to Head Start’s quality at the time of the RCT. Head Start reforms to improve quality […]

  7. […] by imitating the practices of pre-K programs that have larger estimated effects.  As Barnett has pointed out, there is some evidence that Head Start has increased its educational effectiveness since the time […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: